OpenRFC.org Requests For Comments ... for the community
Welcome to OpenRFC
Home Full RFC index RFC humour Our technology
 
RFC 5277
NETCONF Event Notifications.
S. Chisholm, H. Trevino. July 2008.

 
[Direct link][Download PDF version][Download text version]
 

Network Working Group S. Chisholm Request for Comments: 5277 Nortel Category: Standards Track H. Trevino Cisco July 2008 NETCONF Event Notifications Status of This Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Abstract This document defines mechanisms that provide an asynchronous message notification delivery service for the Network Configuration protocol (NETCONF). This is an optional capability built on top of the base NETCONF definition. This document defines the capabilities and operations necessary to support this service. Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1. Definition of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2. Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.3. Event Notifications in NETCONF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2. Notification-Related Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1. Subscribing to Receive Event Notifications . . . . . . . . 5 2.1.1. <create-subscription> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2. Sending Event Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.2.1. <notification> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.3. Terminating the Subscription . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3. Supporting Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.1. Capabilities Exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.1.1. Capability Identifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.1.2. Capability Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.2. Event Streams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.2.1. Event Stream Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.2.2. Event Stream Content Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.2.3. Default Event Stream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.2.4. Event Stream Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.2.5. Event Stream Discovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.3. Notification Replay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3.3.1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3.3.2. Creating a Subscription with Replay . . . . . . . . . 16 3.4. Notification Management Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.5. Subscriptions Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.6. Filter Mechanics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.6.1. Filtering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.7. Message Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 4. XML Schema for Event Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 5. Filtering Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 5.1. Subtree Filtering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 5.2. XPATH Filters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 6. Interleave Capability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 6.1. Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 6.2. Dependencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 6.3. Capability Identifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 6.4. New Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 6.5. Modifications to Existing Operations . . . . . . . . . . . 31 7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 10. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 1. Introduction [NETCONF] can be conceptually partitioned into four layers: Layer Example +-------------+ +-------------------------------------------+ | Content | | Configuration data | +-------------+ +-------------------------------------------+ | | +-------------+ +-------------------------------------------+ | Operations | |<get-config>, <edit-config>, <notification>| +-------------+ +-------------------------------------------+ | | | +-------------+ +-----------------------------+ | | RPC | | <rpc>, <rpc-reply> | | +-------------+ +-----------------------------+ | | | | +-------------+ +-------------------------------------------+ | Transport | | BEEP, SSH, SSL, console | | Protocol | | | +-------------+ +-------------------------------------------+ Figure 1 This document defines mechanisms that provide an asynchronous message notification delivery service for the [NETCONF] protocol. This is an optional capability built on top of the base NETCONF definition. This memo defines the capabilities and operations necessary to support this service. 1.1. Definition of Terms The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. Element: An [XML] Element. Subscription: An agreement and method to receive event notifications over a NETCONF session. A concept related to the delivery of notifications (if there are any to send) involving destination and selection of notifications. It is bound to the lifetime of a session. Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 Operation: This term is used to refer to NETCONF protocol operations [NETCONF]. Within this document, operation refers to NETCONF protocol operations defined in support of NETCONF notifications. Event: An event is something that happens that may be of interest - a configuration change, a fault, a change in status, crossing a threshold, or an external input to the system, for example. Often, this results in an asynchronous message, sometimes referred to as a notification or event notification, being sent to interested parties to notify them that this event has occurred. Replay: The ability to send/re-send previously logged notifications upon request. These notifications are sent asynchronously. This feature is implemented by the NETCONF server and invoked by the NETCONF client. Stream: An event stream is a set of event notifications matching some forwarding criteria and available to NETCONF clients for subscription. Filter: A parameter that indicates which subset of all possible events are of interest. A filter is defined as one or more filter elements [NETCONF], each of which identifies a portion of the overall filter. 1.2. Motivation The motivation for this work is to enable the sending of asynchronous messages that are consistent with the data model (content) and security model used within a NETCONF implementation. The scope of the work aims at meeting the following operational needs: o Initial release should ensure it supports notifications in support of configuration operations. o It should be possible to use the same data model for notifications as for configuration operations. o The solution should support a reasonable message size limit (i.e., not too short). o The notifications should be carried over a connection-oriented delivery mechanism. Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 o A subscription mechanism for notifications should be provided. This takes into account that a NETCONF server does not send notifications before being asked to do so, and that it is the NETCONF client who initiates the flow of notifications. o A filtering mechanism for sending notifications should be put in place within the NETCONF server. o The information contained in a notification should be sufficient so that it can be analyzed independent of the transport mechanism. In other words, the data content fully describes a notification; protocol information is not needed to understand a notification. o The server should have the capability to replay locally logged notifications. 1.3. Event Notifications in NETCONF This memo defines a mechanism whereby the NETCONF client indicates interest in receiving event notifications from a NETCONF server by creating a subscription to receive event notifications. The NETCONF server replies to indicate whether the subscription request was successful and, if it was successful, begins sending the event notifications to the NETCONF client as the events occur within the system. These event notifications will continue to be sent until either the NETCONF session is terminated or the subscription terminates for some other reason. The event notification subscription allows a number of options to enable the NETCONF client to specify which events are of interest. These are specified when the subscription is created. Note that a subscription cannot be modified once created. The NETCONF server MUST accept and process the <close-session> operation, even while the notification subscription is active. The NETCONF server MAY accept and process other commands; otherwise, they will be rejected and the server MUST send a 'resource-denied' error. A NETCONF server advertises support of the ability to process other commands via the :interleave capability. 2. Notification-Related Operations 2.1. Subscribing to Receive Event Notifications The event notification subscription is initiated by the NETCONF client and responded to by the NETCONF server. A subscription is bound to a single stream for the lifetime of the subscription. When the event notification subscription is created, the events of interest are specified. Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 Content for an event notification subscription can be selected by applying user-specified filters. 2.1.1. <create-subscription> Description: This operation initiates an event notification subscription that will send asynchronous event notifications to the initiator of the command until the subscription terminates. Parameters: Stream: An optional parameter, <stream>, that indicates which stream of events is of interest. If not present, events in the default NETCONF stream will be sent. Filter: An optional parameter, <filter>, that indicates which subset of all possible events is of interest. The format of this parameter is the same as that of the filter parameter in the NETCONF protocol operations. If not present, all events not precluded by other parameters will be sent. See section 3.6 for more information on filters. Start Time: A parameter, <startTime>, used to trigger the replay feature and indicate that the replay should start at the time specified. If <startTime> is not present, this is not a replay subscription. It is not valid to specify start times that are later than the current time. If the <startTime> specified is earlier than the log can support, the replay will begin with the earliest available notification. This parameter is of type dateTime and compliant to [RFC3339]. Implementations must support time zones. Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 Stop Time: An optional parameter, <stopTime>, used with the optional replay feature to indicate the newest notifications of interest. If <stopTime> is not present, the notifications will continue until the subscription is terminated. Must be used with and be later than <startTime>. Values of <stopTime> in the future are valid. This parameter is of type dateTime and compliant to [RFC3339]. Implementations must support time zones. Positive Response: If the NETCONF server can satisfy the request, the server sends an <ok> element. Negative Response: An <rpc-error> element is included within the <rpc-reply> if the request cannot be completed for any reason. Subscription requests will fail if a filter with invalid syntax is provided or if the name of a non-existent stream is provided. If a <stopTime> is specified in a request without having specified a <startTime>, the following error is returned: Tag: missing-element Error-type: protocol Severity: error Error-info: <bad-element>: startTime Description: An expected element is missing. If the optional replay feature is requested but it is not supported by the NETCONF server, the following error is returned: Tag: operation-failed Error-type: protocol Severity: error Error-info: none Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 Description: Request could not be completed because the requested operation failed for some reason not covered by any other error condition. If a <stopTime> is requested that is earlier than the specified <startTime>, the following error is returned: Tag: bad-element Error-type: protocol Severity: error Error-info: <bad-element>: stopTime Description: An element value is not correct; e.g., wrong type, out of range, pattern mismatch. If a <startTime> is requested that is later than the current time, the following error is returned: Tag: bad-element Error-type: protocol Severity: error Error-info: <bad-element>: startTime Description: An element value is not correct; e.g., wrong type, out of range, pattern mismatch. 2.1.1.1. Usage Example The following demonstrates creating a simple subscription. More complex examples can be found in section 5. <netconf:rpc message-id="101" xmlns:netconf="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"> <create-subscription xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0"> </create-subscription> </netconf:rpc> Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 2.2. Sending Event Notifications Once the subscription has been set up, the NETCONF server sends the event notifications asynchronously over the connection. 2.2.1. <notification> Description: An event notification is sent to the client who initiated a <create-subscription> command asynchronously when an event of interest (i.e., meeting the specified filtering criteria) has occurred. An event notification is a complete and well-formed XML document. Note that <notification> is not a Remote Procedure Call (RPC) method but rather the top-level element identifying the one- way message as a notification. Parameters: eventTime The time the event was generated by the event source. This parameter is of type dateTime and compliant to [RFC3339]. Implementations must support time zones. Also contains notification-specific tagged content, if any. With the exception of <eventTime>, the content of the notification is beyond the scope of this document. Response: No response. Not applicable. 2.3. Terminating the Subscription Closing of the event notification subscription can be done by using the <close-session> operation from the subscriptions session or terminating the NETCONF session ( <kill-session> ) or the underlying transport session from another session. If a stop time is provided when the subscription is created, the subscription will terminate after the stop time is reached. In this case, the NETCONF session will still be an active session. Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 3. Supporting Concepts 3.1. Capabilities Exchange The ability to process and send event notifications is advertised during the capability exchange between the NETCONF client and server. 3.1.1. Capability Identifier "urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability:notification:1.0" 3.1.2. Capability Example <hello xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"> <capabilities> <capability> urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0 </capability> <capability> urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability:startup:1.0 </capability> <capability> urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability:notification:1.0 </capability> </capabilities> <session-id>4</session-id> </hello> 3.2. Event Streams An event stream is defined as a set of event notifications matching some forwarding criteria. Figure 2 illustrates the notification flow and concepts identified in this document. It does not mandate and/or preclude an implementation. The following is observed from the diagram below: System components (c1..cn) generate event notifications that are passed to a central component for classification and distribution. The central component inspects each event notification and matches the event notification against the set of stream definitions. When a match occurs, the event notification is considered to be a member of that event stream (stream 1..stream n). An event notification may be part of multiple event streams. Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 At some point after the NETCONF server receives the internal event from a stream, it is converted to an appropriate XML encoding by the server, and a <notification> element is ready to send to all NETCONF sessions subscribed to that stream. After generation of the <notification> element, access control is applied by the server. If a session does not have permission to receive the <notification>, then it is discarded for that session, and processing of the internal event is completed for that session. When a NETCONF client subscribes to a given event stream, user- defined filter elements, if applicable, are applied to the event stream and matching event notifications are forwarded to the NETCONF server for distribution to subscribed NETCONF clients. A filter is transferred from the client to the server during the <create- subscription> operation and applied against each <notification> element generated by the stream. For more information on filtering, see Section 3.6. A notification-logging service may also be available, in which case, the central component logs notifications. The NETCONF server may later retrieve logged notifications via the optional replay feature. For more information on replay, see section 3.3. +----+ | c1 |----+ available streams +----+ | +---------+ +----+ | |central |-> stream 1 | c2 | +--->|event |-> stream 2 filter +-------+ +----+ | |processor|-> NETCONF stream ----->|NETCONF| ... | | |-> stream n |server | System | +---------+ +-------+ Components| | /\ ... | | || +----+ | | (------------) || | cn |----+ | (notification) || +----+ +-----> ( logging ) || ( service ) || (------------) || || || \/ +-------+ |NETCONF| |client | +-------+ Figure 2 Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 3.2.1. Event Stream Definition Event streams are predefined on the managed device. The configuration of event streams is outside the scope of this document. However, it is envisioned that event streams are either pre- established by the vendor (pre-configured), user configurable (e.g., part of the device's configuration), or both. Device vendors may allow event stream configuration via the NETCONF protocol (i.e., <edit-config> operation). 3.2.2. Event Stream Content Format The contents of all event streams made available to a NETCONF client (i.e., the notification sent by the NETCONF server) MUST be encoded in XML. 3.2.3. Default Event Stream A NETCONF server implementation supporting the notification capability MUST support the "NETCONF" notification event stream. This stream contains all NETCONF XML event notifications supported by the NETCONF server. The exact string "NETCONF" is used during the advertisement of stream support during the <get> operation on <streams> and during the <create-subscription> operation. Definition of the event notifications and their contents, beyond the inclusion of <eventTime>, for this event stream is outside the scope of this document. 3.2.4. Event Stream Sources With the exception of the default event stream (NETCONF), specification of additional event stream sources (e.g., Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP), syslog) is outside the scope of this document. NETCONF server implementations may leverage any desired event stream source in the creation of supported event streams. 3.2.5. Event Stream Discovery A NETCONF client retrieves the list of supported event streams from a NETCONF server using the <get> operation. 3.2.5.1. Name Retrieval Using <get> Operation The list of available event streams is retrieved by requesting the <streams> subtree via a <get> operation. Available event streams for the requesting session are returned in the reply containing the <name> and <description> elements, where the <name> element is Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 mandatory, and its value is unique within the scope of a NETCONF server. An empty reply is returned if there are no available event streams, due to user-specified filters on the <get> operation. Additional information available about a stream includes whether notification replay is available and, if so, the timestamp of the earliest possible notification to replay. The following example shows retrieving the list of available event stream list using the <get> operation. <rpc message-id="101" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"> <get> <filter type="subtree"> <netconf xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netmod:notification"> <streams/> </netconf> </filter> </get> </rpc> Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 The NETCONF server returns a list of event streams available for subscription: NETCONF, SNMP, and syslog-critical in this example. <rpc-reply message-id="101" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"> <data> <netconf xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netmod:notification"> <streams> <stream> <name>NETCONF</name> <description>default NETCONF event stream </description> <replaySupport>true</replaySupport> <replayLogCreationTime> 2007-07-08T00:00:00Z </replayLogCreationTime> </stream> <stream> <name>SNMP</name> <description>SNMP notifications</description> <replaySupport>false</replaySupport> </stream> <stream> <name>syslog-critical</name> <description>Critical and higher severity </description> <replaySupport>true</replaySupport> <replayLogCreationTime> 2007-07-01T00:00:00Z </replayLogCreationTime> </stream> </streams> </netconf> </data> </rpc-reply> 3.2.5.2. Event Stream Subscription A NETCONF client may request from the NETCONF server the list of event streams available to this session and then issue a <create- subscription> request with the desired event stream name. Omitting the event stream name from the <create-subscription> request results in subscription to the default NETCONF event stream. Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 3.2.5.2.1. Filtering Event Stream Contents The set of event notifications delivered in an event stream may be further refined by applying a user-specified filter supplied at subscription creation time ( <create-subscription> ). This is a transient filter associated with the event notification subscription and does not modify the event stream configuration. The filter element is applied against the contents of the <notification> wrapper and not the wrapper itself. See section 5 for examples. Either subtree or XPATH filtering can be used. XPATH support for the Notification capability is advertised as part of the normal XPATH capability advertisement. If XPATH support is advertised via the XPATH capability, then XPATH is supported for notification filtering. If this capability is not advertised, XPATH is not supported for notification filtering. 3.3. Notification Replay 3.3.1. Overview Replay is the ability to create an event subscription that will resend recently generated notifications, or in some cases send them for the first time to a particular NETCONF client. These notifications are sent the same way as normal notifications. A replay of notifications is specified by including the optional <startTime> parameter to the subscription command, which indicates the start time of the replay. The end time is specified using the optional <stopTime> parameter. If not present, notifications will continue to be sent until the subscription is terminated. A notification stream that supports replay is not expected to have an unlimited supply of saved notifications available to accommodate any replay request. Clients can query <replayLogCreationTime> and <replayLogAgedTime> to learn about the availability of notifications for replay. The actual number of stored notifications available for retrieval at any given time is a NETCONF server implementation-specific matter. Control parameters for this aspect of the feature are outside the scope of this document. Replay is dependent on a notification stream supporting some form of notification logging, although it puts no restrictions on the size or form of the log, or where it resides within the device. Whether or not a stream supports replay can be discovered by doing a <get> operation on the <streams> element of the Notification Management Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 Schema and looking at the value of the <replaySupport> object. This schema also provides the <replayLogCreationTime> element to indicate the earliest available logged notification. 3.3.2. Creating a Subscription with Replay This feature uses optional parameters to the <create-subscription> command called <startTime> and <stopTime>. <startTime> identifies the earliest date and time of interest for event notifications being replayed and also indicates that a subscription will be providing replay of notifications. Events generated before this time are not matched. <stopTime> specifies the latest date and time of interest for event notifications being replayed. If it is not present, then notifications will continue to be sent until the subscription is terminated. Note that <startTime> and <stopTime> are associated with the time an event was generated by the event source. A <replayComplete> notification is sent to indicate that all of the replay notifications have been sent and must not be sent for any other reason. If this subscription has a stop time, then this session becomes a normal NETCONF session again. The NETCONF server will then accept <rpc> operations even if the server did not previously accept such operations due to lack of interleave support. In the case of a subscription without a stop time, after the <replayComplete> notification has been sent, it can be expected that any notifications generated since the start of the subscription creation will be sent, followed by notifications as they arise naturally within the system. The <replayComplete> and <notificationComplete> notifications cannot be filtered out. They will always be sent on a replay subscription that specified a <startTime> and <stopTime>, respectively. 3.4. Notification Management Schema This Schema is used to learn about the event streams supported on the system. It also contains the definition of the <replayComplete> and <notificationComplete> notifications, which are sent to indicate that an event replay has sent all applicable notifications and that the subscription has terminated, respectively. Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:netconf="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0" xmlns:ncEvent="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0" xmlns:manageEvent="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netmod:notification" targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netmod:notification" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" xml:lang="en" version="1.0"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation xml:lang="en"> A schema that can be used to learn about current event streams. It also contains the replayComplete and notificationComplete notification. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd"/> <xs:import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0" schemaLocation="netconf.xsd"/> <xs:import namespace= "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0" schemaLocation="notification.xsd"/> <xs:element name="netconf" type="manageEvent:Netconf"/> <xs:complexType name="Netconf"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="streams" > <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> The list of event streams supported by the system. When a query is issued, the returned set of streams is determined based on user privileges. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded"> <xs:element name="stream"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> Stream name, description, and other information. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 <xs:element name="name" type="ncEvent:streamNameType"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> The name of the event stream. If this is the default NETCONF stream, this must have the value "NETCONF". </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> <xs:element name="description" type="xs:string"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> A description of the event stream, including such information as the type of events that are sent over this stream. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> <xs:element name="replaySupport" type="xs:boolean"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> An indication of whether or not event replay is available on this stream. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> <xs:element name="replayLogCreationTime" type="xs:dateTime" minOccurs="0"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> The timestamp of the creation of the log used to support the replay function on this stream. Note that this might be earlier then the earliest available notification in the log. This object is updated if the log resets for some reason. This object MUST be present if replay is supported. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> <xs:element name="replayLogAgedTime" type="xs:dateTime" minOccurs="0"> Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> The timestamp of the last notification aged out of the log. This object MUST be present if replay is supported and any notifications have been aged out of the log. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="ReplayCompleteNotificationType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:extension base="ncEvent:NotificationContentType"/> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:element name="replayComplete" type="manageEvent:ReplayCompleteNotificationType" substitutionGroup="ncEvent:notificationContent"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> This notification is sent to signal the end of a replay portion of a subscription. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> <xs:complexType name="NotificationCompleteNotificationType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:extension base="ncEvent:NotificationContentType"/> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:element name="notificationComplete" type="manageEvent:NotificationCompleteNotificationType" substitutionGroup="ncEvent:notificationContent"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> This notification is sent to signal the end of a Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 notification subscription. It is sent in the case that stopTime was specified during the creation of the subscription. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> </xs:schema> 3.5. Subscriptions Data Subscriptions are non-persistent state information, and their lifetime is defined by their session or by the <stopTime> parameter. 3.6. Filter Mechanics If a filter element is specified to look for data of a particular value, and the data item is not present within a particular event notification for its value to be checked against, the notification will be filtered out. For example, if one were to check for 'severity=critical' in a configuration event notification where this field was not supported, then the notification would be filtered out. For subtree filtering, a non-empty node set means that the filter matches. For XPath filtering, the mechanisms defined in [XPATH] should be used to convert the returned value to boolean. 3.6.1. Filtering Filtering is explicitly stated when the event notification subscription is created. This is specified via the 'filter' parameter. A Filter only exists as a parameter to the subscription. 3.7. Message Flow The following figure depicts message flow between a NETCONF client (C) and NETCONF server (S) in order to create a subscription and begin the flow of notifications. This subscription specifies a <startTime>, so the server starts by replaying logged notifications. It is possible that many rpc/rpc-reply sequences occur before the subscription is created, but this is not depicted in the figure. Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 C S | | | capability exchange | |-------------------------->| |<------------------------->| | | | <create-subscription> | (startTime) |-------------------------->| |<--------------------------| | <rpc-reply> | | | | <notification> | |<--------------------------| | | | <notification> | |<--------------------------| | <notification> | (replayComplete) |<--------------------------| | | | | | | | <notification> | |<--------------------------| | | | | | <notification> | |<--------------------------| | | | | Figure 3 The following figure depicts message flow between a NETCONF client (C) and NETCONF server (S) in order to create a subscription and begin the flow of notifications. This subscription specified a <startTime> and <stopTime> so it starts by replaying logged notifications and then returns to be a normal command-response NETCONF session after the <replayComplete> and <notificationComplete> notifications are sent and it is available to process <rpc> requests. It is possible that many rpc/rpc-reply sequences occur before the subscription is created, but this is not depicted in the figure. Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 C S | | | capability exchange | |-------------------------->| |<------------------------->| | | | <create-subscription> | (startTime, |-------------------------->| stopTime) |<--------------------------| | <rpc-reply> | | | | <notification> | |<--------------------------| | | | <notification> | |<--------------------------| | <notification> | (replayComplete) |<--------------------------| | <notification> |(notificationComplete) |<--------------------------| | | | | | | | <rpc> | |-------------------------->| |<--------------------------| | <rpc-reply> | | | Figure 4 4. XML Schema for Event Notifications The following [XMLSchema] defines NETCONF Event Notifications. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0" xmlns:netconf="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0" targetNamespace= "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" xml:lang="en"> Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 <!-- import standard XML definitions --> <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> This import accesses the xml: attribute groups for the xml:lang as declared on the error-message element. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> </xs:import> <!-- import base netconf definitions --> <xs:import namespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0" schemaLocation="netconf.xsd"/> <!-- ************** Symmetrical Operations ********************--> <!-- <create-subscription> operation --> <xs:complexType name="createSubscriptionType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:extension base="netconf:rpcOperationType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="stream" type="streamNameType" minOccurs="0"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> An optional parameter that indicates which stream of events is of interest. If not present, then events in the default NETCONF stream will be sent. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> <xs:element name="filter" type="netconf:filterInlineType" minOccurs="0"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> An optional parameter that indicates which subset of all possible events is of interest. The format of this parameter is the same as that of the filter parameter in the NETCONF protocol operations. If not present, all events not precluded by other parameters will be sent. Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> <xs:element name="startTime" type="xs:dateTime" minOccurs="0" > <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> A parameter used to trigger the replay feature indicating that the replay should start at the time specified. If start time is not present, this is not a replay subscription. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> <xs:element name="stopTime" type="xs:dateTime" minOccurs="0" > <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> An optional parameter used with the optional replay feature to indicate the newest notifications of interest. If stop time is not present, the notifications will continue until the subscription is terminated. Must be used with startTime. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> </xs:sequence> </xs:extension> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:simpleType name="streamNameType"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> The name of an event stream. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:restriction base="xs:string"/> </xs:simpleType> Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 24]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 <xs:element name="create-subscription" type="createSubscriptionType" substitutionGroup="netconf:rpcOperation"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> The command to create a notification subscription. It takes as argument the name of the notification stream and filter. Both of those options limit the content of the subscription. In addition, there are two time-related parameters, startTime and stopTime, which can be used to select the time interval of interest to the notification replay feature. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> <!-- ************** One-way Operations ******************--> <!-- <Notification> operation --> <xs:complexType name="NotificationContentType"/> <xs:element name="notificationContent" type="NotificationContentType" abstract="true"/> <xs:complexType name="NotificationType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="eventTime" type="xs:dateTime"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> The time the event was generated by the event source. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> </xs:element> <xs:element ref="notificationContent"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> <xs:element name="notification" type="NotificationType"/> </xs:schema> Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 25]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 5. Filtering Examples The following section provides examples to illustrate the various methods of filtering content on an event notification subscription. In order to illustrate the use of filter expressions, it is necessary to assume some of the event notification content. The examples below assume that the event notification schema definition has an <event> element at the top level consisting of the event class (e.g., fault, state, config), reporting entity, and either severity or operational state. Examples in this section are generated from the following fictional Schema. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xs:schema targetNamespace="http://example.com/event/1.0" xmlns="http://example.com/event/1.0" elementFormDefault="qualified" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:ncEvent="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0"> <xs:import namespace= "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0" schemaLocation="notification.xsd"/> <xs:complexType name="eventType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:extension base="ncEvent:NotificationContentType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="eventClass" /> <xs:element name="reportingEntity"> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:any namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:choice> <xs:element name="severity"/> <xs:element name="operState"/> </xs:choice> </xs:sequence> </xs:extension> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 26]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 <xs:element name="event" type="eventType" substitutionGroup="ncEvent:notificationContent"/> </xs:schema> The above fictional notification definition could result in the following sample notification list, which is used in the examples in this section. <notification xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0"> <eventTime>2007-07-08T00:01:00Z</eventTime> <event xmlns="http://example.com/event/1.0"> <eventClass>fault</eventClass> <reportingEntity> <card>Ethernet0</card> </reportingEntity> <severity>major</severity> </event> </notification> <notification xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0"> <eventTime>2007-07-08T00:02:00Z</eventTime> <event xmlns="http://example.com/event/1.0"> <eventClass>fault</eventClass> <reportingEntity> <card>Ethernet2</card> </reportingEntity> <severity>critical</severity> </event> </notification> <notification xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0"> <eventTime>2007-07-08T00:04:00Z</eventTime> <event xmlns="http://example.com/event/1.0"> <eventClass>fault</eventClass> <reportingEntity> <card>ATM1</card> </reportingEntity> <severity>minor</severity> </event> </notification> Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 27]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 <notification xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0"> <eventTime>2007-07-08T00:10:00Z</eventTime> <event xmlns="http://example.com/event/1.0"> <eventClass>state</eventClass> <reportingEntity> <card>Ethernet0</card> </reportingEntity> <operState>enabled</operState> </event> </notification> 5.1. Subtree Filtering XML subtree filtering is not well-suited for creating elaborate filter definitions given that it only supports equality comparisons and application of the logical OR operators (e.g., in an event subtree, give me all event notifications that have severity=critical, severity=major, or severity=minor). Nevertheless, it may be used for defining simple event notification forwarding filters as shown below. The following example illustrates how to select fault events which have severities of critical, major, or minor. The filtering criteria evaluation is as follows: ((fault & severity=critical) | (fault & severity=major) | (fault & severity=minor)) <netconf:rpc netconf:message-id="101" xmlns:netconf="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"> <create-subscription xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0"> <filter netconf:type="subtree"> <event xmlns="http://example.com/event/1.0"> <eventClass>fault</eventClass> <severity>critical</severity> </event> <event xmlns="http://example.com/event/1.0"> <eventClass>fault</eventClass> <severity>major</severity> </event> <event xmlns="http://example.com/event/1.0"> <eventClass>fault</eventClass> <severity>minor</severity> </event> </filter> </create-subscription> </netconf:rpc> Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 28]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 The following example illustrates how to select state or config EventClasses or fault events that are related to card Ethernet0. The filtering criteria evaluation is as follows: ( state | config | ( fault & ( card=Ethernet0))) <netconf:rpc netconf:message-id="101" xmlns:netconf="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"> <create-subscription xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0"> <filter netconf:type="subtree"> <event xmlns="http://example.com/event/1.0"> <eventClass>state</eventClass> </event> <event xmlns="http://example.com/event/1.0"> <eventClass>config</eventClass> </event> <event xmlns="http://example.com/event/1.0"> <eventClass>fault</eventClass> <reportingEntity> <card>Ethernet0</card> </reportingEntity> </event> </filter> </create-subscription> </netconf:rpc> 5.2. XPATH Filters The following [XPATH] example illustrates how to select fault EventClass notifications that have severities of critical, major, or minor. The filtering criteria evaluation is as follows: ((fault) & ((severity=critical) | (severity=major) | (severity = minor))) <netconf:rpc netconf:message-id="101" xmlns:netconf="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"> <create-subscription xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0"> <filter netconf:type="xpath" xmlns:ex="http://example.com/event/1.0" select="/ex:event[ex:eventClass='fault' and (ex:severity='minor' or ex:severity='major' or ex:severity='critical')]"/> </create-subscription> </netconf:rpc> Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 29]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 The following example illustrates how to select state and config EventClasses or fault events of any severity that come from card Ethernet0. The filtering criteria evaluation is as follows: ( state | config | (fault & card=Ethernet0)) <netconf:rpc message-id="101" xmlns:netconf="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"> <create-subscription xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0"> <filter netconf:type="xpath" xmlns:ex="http://example.com/event/1.0" select="/ex:event[ (ex:eventClass='state' or ex:eventClass='config') or ((ex:eventClass='fault' and ex:card='Ethernet0'))]"/> </create-subscription> </netconf:rpc> 6. Interleave Capability 6.1. Description The :interleave capability indicates that the NETCONF peer supports the ability to interleave other NETCONF operations within a notification subscription. This means the NETCONF server MUST receive, process, and respond to NETCONF requests on a session with an active notification subscription. This capability helps scalability by reducing the total number of NETCONF sessions required by a given operator or management application. 6.2. Dependencies This capability is dependent on the notification capability being supported. 6.3. Capability Identifier The :interleave capability is identified by the following capability string: urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability:interleave:1.0 Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 30]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 6.4. New Operations None. 6.5. Modifications to Existing Operations When a <create-subscription> is sent while another subscription is active on that session, the following error will be returned: Tag: operation-failed Error-type: protocol Severity: error Error-info: none Description: Request could not be completed because the requested operation failed for some reason not covered by any other error condition. 7. Security Considerations The security considerations from the base [NETCONF] document also apply to the Notification capability. The access control framework and the choice of transport will have a major impact on the security of the solution. The <notification> elements are never sent before the transport layer and the NETCONF layer, including capabilities exchange, have been established and the manager has been identified and authenticated. It is recommended that care be taken to secure execution: o <create-subscription> invocation o <get> on read-only data models o <notification> content Secure execution means ensuring that a secure transport is used as well as ensuring that the user has sufficient authorization to perform the function they are requesting against the specific subset of NETCONF content involved. When a <get> is received that refers to the content defined in this memo, clients should only be able to view the content for which they have sufficient privileges. A create <create-subscription> operation can be considered like a deferred Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 31]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 <get>, and the content that different users can access may vary. This different access is reflected in the <notification> that different users are able to subscribe to. One potential security issue is the transport of data from non- NETCONF streams, such as syslog and SNMP. This data may be more vulnerable (or less vulnerable) when being transported over NETCONF than when being transported using the protocol normally used for transporting it, depending on the security credentials of the two subsystems. The NETCONF server is responsible for applying access control to stream content. The contents of notifications, as well as the names of event streams, may contain sensitive information and care should be taken to ensure that they are viewed only by authorized users. The NETCONF server MUST NOT include any content in a notification that the user is not authorized to view. If a subscription is created with a <stopTime>, the NETCONF session will return to being a normal command-response NETCONF session when the replay is completed. It is the responsibility of the NETCONF client to close this session when it is no longer of use. If a malicious or buggy NETCONF client sends a number of <create- subscription> requests, then these subscriptions accumulate and may use up system resources. In such a situation, subscriptions can be terminated by terminating the suspect underlying NETCONF sessions using the <kill-session> operation. 8. IANA Considerations This document registers three URIs for the NETCONF XML namespace in the IETF XML registry [RFC3688]. Following the format in RFC 3688, IANA has made the following registration. Note that the capability URNs are also compliant to section 10.3 of [NETCONF]. +--------------------+----------------------------------------------+ | Index | Capability Identifier | +--------------------+----------------------------------------------+ | :notification | urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability: | | | notification:1.0 | | | | | :interleave | urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability: | | | interleave:1.0 | +--------------------+----------------------------------------------+ Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 32]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netmod:notification URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0 Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. In addition, IANA registered the XML Schema defined in Section 4. 9. Acknowledgements Thanks to Gilbert Gagnon, Greg Wilbur, and Kim Curran for providing their input into the early work on this document. In addition, the editors would like to acknowledge input at the Vancouver editing session from the following people: Orly Nicklass, James Balestriere, Yoshifumi Atarashi, Glenn Waters, Alexander Clemm, Dave Harrington, Dave Partain, Ray Atarashi, David Perkins, and the following additional people from the Montreal editing session: Balazs Lengyel, Phil Shafer, Rob Enns, Andy Bierman, Dan Romascanu, Bert Wijnen, Simon Leinen, Juergen Schoenwaelder, Hideki Okita, Vincent Cridlig, Martin Bjorklund, Olivier Festor, Radu State, Brian Trammell, and William Chow. We would also like to thank Li Yan for his numerous reviews, as well as Suresh Krishnan for his gen-art review of the document. 10. Normative References [NETCONF] Enns, R., Ed., "NETCONF Configuration Protocol", RFC 4741, December 2006. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC3339] Klyne, G., Ed. and C. Newman, "Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps", RFC 3339, July 2002. [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, January 2004. [XML] World Wide Web Consortium, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0", W3C XML, February 1998, <http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210>. [XMLSchema] Thompson, H., Beech, D., Maloney, M., and N. Mendelsohn, "XML Schema Part 1: Structures Second Edition", W3C http ://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-1-20041028/ structures.html, October 2004. Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 33]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 [XPATH] Clark, J. and S. DeRose, "XML Path Language (XPath) Version 1.0", W3C http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xpath-19991116, November 1999. Authors' Addresses Sharon Chisholm Nortel 3500 Carling Ave Nepean, Ontario K2H 8E9 Canada EMail: schishol@nortel.com Hector Trevino Cisco Suite 400 9155 E. Nichols Ave Englewood, CO 80112 USA EMail: htrevino@cisco.com Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 34]
RFC 5277 NETCONF Event Notifications July 2008 Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Intellectual Property The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. Chisholm & Trevino Standards Track [Page 35]

   

[Home] [Full RFC index] [RFC humour] [Our technology]

Copyright © Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services, Inc.  All rights reserved.
All trademarks and RFC contents are the property of their respective owners.